WOMEN OF SHAITAAN & THE MASJID

In: Books, Female & Hijaab
Tagged: , ,

eBook: Women of Shaitaan & The Masaajid

Book Introduction & Contents Below

BOOK CONTENTS

FOREWORD – PAGE 3

INTRODUCTION  – PAGE 7
THE JAMIATKZN’S POSITION 15

SECTION 1 – USOOL-E-FIQH & WOMEN ATTENDING THE MASAAJID – PAGE 19
THE FATWA OF NABI SALLALLAHU ALAYHI WASALLAM 21
‘STUDIED’ USOOL-E-FIQH 22
ABROGATION 23
HARAAM FOREVER! 32
JEANS & TOPS 36
NOT MUBAAH MUTLAQAN 39
DUROOD (NOT JUST ‘SAW’) AND ALLAMAH IBN HAJAR HAITAMI RAHIMAHULLAH 41

SECTION 2 – HADHRAT UMAR RADHIYALLLAHU ANHU & WOMEN ATTENDING THE MASAAJID – PAGE 45
ONLY FAJR AND ESHA??? 51
DO NOT PREVENT WOMEN 53
THE ACTUAL ISSUE WITH HADHRAT AATIKAH RADHIYALLAHU ANHA 57
MUFTI KIFAAYATULLAH RAHIMAHULLAH 58
HADHRAT AATIKA’S RADHIYALLAHU ANHA VIEW 62
IBN HIBBAAN AND WOMEN ATTENDING THE MASJID 65

SECTION 3 – THE VIRTUES OF WOMEN PERFORMING SALAAT AT HOME – PAGE 66
A BLATANT LIE 67
THE HADEETH OF UMME HUMAID 69
GENERAL COMMENDATION 78
THE WOMEN OF MEDINA 81
ONE THOUSAND PRAYERS 84
IBN HAZM 85
MOSQUES AROUND THE WORLD 88

SECTION 4 – THE FATWA OF HADHRAT AYESHA RADHIYALLAHU ANHA – PAGE 89
THE CLASSICAL JURISTS 91
IMAAM MAALIK 94
THE FATWA OF THE MAALIKI MATH-HAB 101
IBN HAJAR 105
THE FATWA OF THE SHAAFI MATH-HAB 109
IBN QUDAAMAH 113
THE FATWA OF THE HAMBALI MATH-HAB 118
BASELESS OPINION VS HADHRAT AYESHA’S FATWA 124
ATTEMPT TO REBUKE 126
PUNISHMENT 129

SECTION 5 – THE FITNAH ARGUMENT – PAGE 133
THE SUNNAH 134
NO CURTAIN OR WALL 138
HADHRAT FADHL IBN ABBAS RADHIYALLAHU ANHU 140

SECTION 6 – THE JILBAAB AND EID SALAAT – PAGE 145
THE WUJOOB OF THE JILBAAB 147
THE FATWA OF THE HANAFI MATH-HAB 152
MS AMRA’S BASELESS ACCUSATIONS 156

SUMMARY – PAGE 158

FOREWORD

We praise Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala Who has commanded women to remain glued to their homes, and Who has honoured the Sahaabah Radhiyallahu Anhum in the Qur’aan at several places.

Durood and Salaams unto our Master and Leader, Muhammed Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam who unequivocally stated: “The closest a woman is unto Allah is in the innermost corner of her home.”

Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam also explicitly said “My Sahaabah are like stars. Whichever one of them you follow, you will be rightly guided.” Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam instructed us to hold on to the Sunnah of the Sahaabah.

Alhamdulillah, this is the third booklet presented to you on the topic of women attending the Masaajid and the Eidgah. The first two booklets were:

1) Women attending the Eidgah – Response to Habibia Soofie Mosque.

2) Honouring Islam and the Deen by banning women from the Masaajid – Response to Nuraan Davids.

Both books are available on our website.
Besides the above, the Ulama-e-Haq have prepared many other booklets in refutation of the deviates on the topic of women attending the Masaajid. And Insha Allah, many more booklets and articles shall be prepared on this topic.

In this era of Fitnah (temptation) and Fasaad (corruption) it has been observed that more and more Muslims are being misled by those who promote and encourage women to attend the Masaajid.

Many treatises, articles, books, etc. have already been written which conclusively prove that it is Haraam for women to attend the Masaajid. Hitherto, no one has been able to refute any of the treatises written by the Ulama-e-Haq.

However, in view of their impotency of refuting the Haqq, deviates are trying new Shaitaani tricks in order to establish a hallucinated ‘permissibility’ of women attending the Masaajid in this belated 21st Century of Fitnah and Fasaad (temptation and corruption).

Since they are hell-bent on trying to forge a basis – albeit fruitlessly – for the alleged permissibility of women attending the Masaajid, Eidgah, etc. in this belated era in which immorality preponderates, they have opened up several cans of worms for the consumption of the ignorant. Since those ‘worms’ are dipped in sugar and colouring, the ignorant and unwary – who do not understand the high rank of the Sahaabah Radhiyallahu Anhum – relish on those worms which the deviates feed to them.

It is an irrefutable fact that the Sahaabah Radhiyallahu Anhum banned women from the Masaajid. However, it is observed that many Muslims are not honouring the Sahaabah Radhiyallahu Anhum, especially when it comes to the issue of women attending the Masaajid!!!

In view of such satanic aberration, it is necessary for the Ulama-e-Haq to take up cudgels against such Shaitaani characters. After all, deviation is indeed the ‘Tabligh’ of Shaitaan and his cronies.

Shaitaan whispers into their minds ‘rubbish’ and accordingly they write ‘open letters’ of drivel, quoting unwanted and selective translations of the weak arguments of Ibn Hazm which are nothing but skulduggery and chicanery, and not-to-forget the puny drivel and frail arguments of Jasser Auda and Akram Nadwi which are currently being refuted in detail by the Ulama-e-Haqq!!!

Thus, keeping in mind the honour of the Sahaabah Radhiyallahu Anhum, this refutation is presented to the Ahle-Haqq – those who are really interested in the Shariah. And Insha Allah, many more booklets and articles shall be prepared on this topic. Those deviates who are promoting the permissibility of women attending the Masaajid have hitherto, not been able to present even a single valid argument for their stance. All their arguments are specious and baseless.

Insha Allah, all their arguments will be refuted and their Shaitaani deception will be exposed.

Jamiatul Ulama Northern Cape

24 Muharram 1443
2 September 2021

Book Introduction

Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said:

“Women are the traps of Shaitaan.”

With the Fadhl of Allah Ta’ala, this treatise is a brief refutation of the weak and apodallic (baseless) arguments of Ms Amra, Jasser Auda and their moronic Zindeeq ilk who are laboriously trying to concoct a ‘basis’ for the hallucinated permissibility of women attending the Masaajid, the Eidgah, etc.

Some Be-hayaa (shameless-immoral) Faasiqah (a woman who fraglantly and publicly commits sinful acts) who even travels shamelessly without a Mahram which is in direct conflict with the commands of Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam, pretending to be a ‘mujtahid’ (obviously a fake one) had published a so-called response to some ‘Ulama’ on the topic of women attending the Masaajid.

The ghuthaa (flotsam and drivel) disseminated and propagated by the Shayaateen in the rubbish so-called response was entitled as ‘An open letter I wrote to the Jamiatul Ulama KZN. Insha Allah you will find benefit too.’

Insha Allah you will find immense benefit in this response to Ms Amra, who hallucinates that she understands Fiqh better than the Sahaabah, the Four Math-habs, the thousands of Fuqaha, Muhadditheen, Mufassireen, Ulama-e-Haq, etc. who prohibit women from the Masaajid and who categorically reject any general permission for women to attend the Masaajid.

Amra and Auda are peddling the misleading notion of the general permissibility of women attending the Masaajid – a stupid and rejected view not held by any Faqeeh in the history of Islam. It is a corrupt view which was not held by any Sahaabi and which is in total conflict with the Sunnah of Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam!

In simple terms, the view of ‘general permissibility of women attending the Masaajid’ is in conflict with the Shariah. There is no such corrupt view in the Shariah. For the last 1441 years, it is the first time that morons have come up with this satanic view.

Misinterpreting the Qur’aan and Ahaadeeth to postulate and prove the mardood opinion that women may generally attend the Masaajid, intermingle with men, deliver lectures to men, and adorn themselves when they attend the Masjid, etc. is clear-cut Kufr. This is implicit rejection of the Ahaadeeth. In fact, Jasser Auda misinterprets the Qur’aan to ‘prove’ that women may adorn themselves when they attend the Masaajid!!! And this Jasser Auda and his ilk of Zindeeqs are promoted by IPSA & Co!!!

The very Imaan of Jasser Auda is questionable. With his Jahannami views, he has ‘rejected’ the Qur’aan and Sunnah which renders him a Zindeeq.  And those who ‘follow’ Jasser Auda are treading the same path of Kufr and Zandaqah. In this regard, the Faasiqaat, Faajiraat and Jaahilaat inanely known as ‘Women of Waqf’ should take heed.

A Zindeeq is basically a non-Muslim. He professes to be a Muslim and believes that he is a Muslim. He performs Salaat and generally acts as a Muslim. However, he interprets and misinterprets the Qur’aan and Hadith in such a way that conflicts with the beliefs and practices which the Shariah teaches us.

He subjects the tenets of Islam to his personal opinion and fabricates ideas which are in conflict with the teachings which have come down to us from the time of Rasulullah (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam).

It should also be remembered that the Ulama-e-Haq do not fear the threats of Murtad lawyers who are promoting and defending the Kufr of the anti-patriarchal ‘prostitutes and/or lesbians’ and who are also planning to lure the Ulama-e-Haq to the Kuffaar courts over the issue of prohibiting women from frequenting the Masaajid, Eidgah, etc.!

The Shariah is clear on the prohibition of women attending the Masaajid and no moron lawyer is going to ‘cow’ the Ulama-e-Haq with his stupid moos and woos in favour of lesbians and Zaaniyaat who oppose the Shariah and misinterpret the Qur’aan and Sunnah. Alhamdulillah, the Ulama-e-Haq do not fear shadows – least of all the dark and ominous shadows of anti-Shariah Zindeeq-idiots.

The very usage of the term ‘open letter’ reeks of Nafsaaniyyat. Instead of attending to her ‘Tazkiyyah’  which is Fardh according to the Qur’aan, she attacks the Ulama and promotes the rubbish drivel of Jasser Auda. The drivel of morons and Zindeeqs such as Akram Nadwi, Jasser Auda, etc. will be refuted in other detailed treatises Insha Allah.

She thinks that she has ‘silenced’ the Ulama with her disparate essay in a desperate bid to prove the permissibility of women attending the Masaajid.

Deviates, Zindeeqs, sciolists and all these female ‘Mosque-invaders’ should realise that they have failed and they will always fail to prove that it is permissible for women to attend the Masaajid. On the contrary, it has been proven over-and-over that it is Haraam for women to attend the Masaajid.

She had attempted to ‘abrogate’ the Fatwa of Prohibition of women attending the Masaajid which exists since the era of the Sahaabah Radhiyallahu Anhum – a solid and unassailable Fatwa which is based on the Usool of the Shariah handed to the Sahaabah by Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam himself.

She tries to override the Ijmaa’ of the Sahaabah, the Ijmaa’ of the four Math-habs, thousands of Aimmah-e-Mujtahideen, Fuqaha, Muhadditheen, Mufassirreen, and the Ulama, etc. by presenting her lopsided and defective understanding of Usool-e-Fiqh. This speaks volumes of her shamelessness and shows that she hardly has any link with Fiqh and the Fuqaha. In fact, her links to the Shariah are very scant. This is explained in section one.

She impudently and slanderously also ropes in the name of Hadhrat Umar Radhiyallahu Anhu in her abortive attempt to prove the permissibility of women attending the Masaajid without realising that whatever she has quoted proves the direct opposite of what she is peddling in the name of Hadhrat Umar Radhiyallahu Anhu. Hadhrat Umar Radhiyallahu Anhu is famous for being against women attending the Masaajid. And this fact is garnered by those who are genuinely linked to Fiqh.

She then advertises her ignorance by quoting Hadhrat Aatikah Radhiyallahu Anha but she – either intentionally or ignorantly – does not mention why Hadhrat Aatika Radhiyallahu Anha stopped attending the Masaajid. Yet, she demands from the Ulama that they display ‘good scholarship’, honesty, etc. without realizing what a phony so-called student she is. She thinks she will get away with all her baseless and disparaging accusations against the Ulama, etc. This is explained in section two.

She also makes a fool of herself in a stupid and unacademic attempt to discard the authentic Ahaadeeth which state that a woman’s Salaat at home is better than her Salaat in the Masaajid. In this regard, she reveals her foolhardy ignorance to those who are acquainted with the science of Hadeeth. In section three, this is discussed.

Then she makes the huge blunder, if she is a Muslim, of trying to water down the authority of Hadhrat Ayesha Radhiyallahu Anha and her rock-solid Fatwa which was upheld by the Fuqaha as well as the Sahaabah of her era. She does not seem to realise that she is nothing in comparison to Hadhrat Ayesha Radhiyallahu Anha, who was a paragon of virtue and Hijaab! Hadhrat Ayesha Radhiyallahu Anha is no ordinary person as will be explained further. Section four is in defence and honour of the Fatwa of Hadhrat Ayesha Radhiyallahu Anha.

Furthermore, she unintelligently utilizes the names of Allamah Ibn Hajar Asqalaani and Allamah Ibn Qudaamah Rahimahumullah. Her recklessness does not allow her to realise that neither Allamah Ibn Hajar nor Allamah ibn Qudaamah hold the view of ‘general permissibility’ which she is marketing for her ‘boss’ notoriously known as Shaitaan!

She also fails to realize that she is NOT A MUJTAHID and therefore she has no right to refer directly to the Qur’aan or Hadeeth for the sake of deriving Masaail. Aggravated is her misapplication of the Ahaadeeth and even the rejection of authentic Ahaadeeth by rubbishing them off as ‘dhaeef’ (weak).

She intentionally and conveniently does not mention anywhere in her essay the conditions for the initial permissibility of women attending the Masaajid, because she knows that the conditions are not upheld in this age which brings one to the conclusion that it is Haraam for women to attend the Masaajid.

Accordingly, in her article she selectively and slanderously cites Imaam Maalik, Ibn Hajar Asqalaani and Ibn Qudaamah and hence, she hopelessly fails to present the views of any other Faqeeh on the specific issue of whether it is permissible or impermissible for women to attend the Masaajid, yet she accuses the Ulama of not sharing ‘the full spectrum of opinions’.

This is a clear indication of her status in the Shariah. It also shows her miserable failure in the academic sphere. Since she is unable to quote the views of the Fuqaha on the specific Mas’alah, it was merely eristic for her to make mention of Usool-e-Fiqh. She wants to score points no matter which devil she pleases.

At the very end of her essay, she betrays her audacity, contumacy and ghabaawat (moronity) with the following averment which stinks of jahaalat (ignorance), takabbur (pride) and hamaaqat (foolishness):

“I hope that the above discussion will encourage the Jamiat and other Ulemah bodies to be more circumspect in their presentation of Islamic teachings in the future, insha Allah. Good scholarship requires honesty…..”

The ‘above discussion’ refers to her stupid essay which she wrote in ‘response’ to JamiatKZN. She deceives herself by believing that she has satanically succeeded in refuting the JamiatKZN and that she has also achieved (most probably in her dreams) the diabolic aim of making the Ulama-e-Haq acquiescent to sciolists and Juhala (ignoramuses) who don’t know head or tail of the Shariah and its Usools (principles).

According to Ms Amra, the Ulama-e-Haq who prohibit women from attending the Masaajid, are not circumspect in the presentation of Islamic teachings, not honest, etc. etc.

Her criticism brings within its scope all the innumerable Fuqaha who have issued Fataawa against women attending the Masaajid. Exacerbating her baseless criticism, she attacks Hadhrat Ayesha Radhiyallahu Anha like a Shia Kaafir.

Alhamdulillah, when Allah Ta’ala wishes that a certain person must be exposed, then Allah Ta’ala creates the circumstances also for such an exposure. When non-entities pretend to be Ulama and they speak on issues in which they are wholly unqualified, they make a mess of the topic with all their ignorance.

Her ‘open letter’ is heavily flawed. Despite the baselessness of Amra’s arguments as will be explained further on Insha Allah, the casuistry and chicanery of her write-up would not be detected by many people, especially non-Ulama.

Considering all of this, it is necessary to respond to her. In the blessed words of Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam:

“This Ilm (of the Shariah) will be borne by the pious of every successive generation.  They (the Ulama-e-Haqq) will drive away from it (this Shariah) the interpolations of the deviates, the falsehood of the false-mongers and the interpretations of the ignoramuses.”        (Mishkaat)

THE JAMIATKZN’S POSITION

Before responding to Amra’s arguments, it is necessary for one to understand JamiatKZN’s opinion which she had hopelessly attempted to respond to in her ‘open essay’. At the end of their article which they emailed, The Jamiat KZN concluded as follows:

“Thus, based on the above, women should not go to the Masjid for Salaat or attend the Eid Salaat as it is strongly discouraged in light of the fitna that is prevalent.”

It is necessary to state that women are not only strongly discouraged, but women are totally prohibited from attending the Masaajid. The Fatwa of the Shariah is that women are totally prohibited from attending the Masaajid.

Whilst it is correct to say that ‘women should not go to the Masjid for Salaat or attend the Eid Salaat’, it is an injustice to Fiqh to be contented and satisfied by merely stating that females attending the Masaajid is strongly discouraged! The Fiqh Kutub place a total ban on females attending the Masaajid!

Fitnah is an Illat of Hurmat. Fitnah leads to Haraam. An act that leads to Haraam is not just discouraged. It is Haraam. The Qur’aan bears testimony to this. Their articles and opinions make it clear to the Ulama-e-Haq that both –Amra and Jamiat KZN – need to go study Usool-e-Fiqh properly and diligently under expert Muftis who really have the Ummah at heart.

Whatever leads to Zina is Haraam. And Allah Ta’ala prohibited Nabi Aadam Alayhis Salaam and Hadhrat Hawwaa Alayhas Salaam from even going close to the tree which was forbidden for them to eat from! This is mentioned in the Qur’aan. And these are Usools of Fiqh which Amra and Jamiat KZN need to learn.

Why did the JamiatKZN not state clearly that it is impermissible for women to perform Salaat at the Masaajid? Why did they suffice with the ‘ruling’ of it being ‘strongly discouraged in light of the fitna that is prevalent’? Why not state the prohibition explicitly?

Why did they not say that it is Haraam for women to attend the Masaajid? The Hanafi Fuqaha clearly mention the view of impermissibility. Jamiat KZN should heed the following Fatwa of Allamah Ibn Hajar Rahimahullah which is food for thought for all Muftis, Sheikhs and Molvis who steer away from clearly and explicitly banning and prohibiting women from the Masaajid:

“And, no one will hesitate in prohibiting women (from the Musjid, the Eidgah, the shopping malls, and emerging from the home in general) except a ghabi (moron) who is a jaahil, and who lacks ability in understanding the subtleties of the Shariah …………The correct verdict is categorical Tahreem (i.e. haraam for women to come to the Musjid), and this is the Fatwa. And, this in a nutshell is our (Shaafi’) Math-hab.” (Al-Fataawal Fiqhiyatul Kubra)

Nevertheless, it should be noted that Jamiat KZN discourages women from attending the Masaajid and the Eidgah, whereas Ms Amra is of the opposite view. Both are morons according to Allamah Ibn Hajar Haitami Rahimahullah, but of different degrees!

As a result, Baatil (falsehood) has to be smashed and crushed with the Fadhl of Allah Subhaanahu Wa Ta’ala, as Allah Ta’ala clearly says:

“We fling the Haqq on Baatil. Then it smashes its (i.e. Baatil’s) brains out. Then suddenly it vanishes.” (Qur’aan)

Read the Full Kitaab: ‘Women of Shaitaan & The Masjid – A Brief Response to The Women Who Are Waqf To Shaitaan’ (PDF)