Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said: “When you see those reviling my As-haab (companions), then say: ‘May the Curse of Allah be on your evil!’” [Sunan Tirmizi]

Recently, an uucsa chap known as Haroon Al-Azhari of the Cape Town so-called Ulama board engaged with the Kaafir Shia who recently declared the three most virtuous Sahaabah as Munaafiqeen (Nauthubillah), baselessly accused them of usurping the Khilaafat (Nauthubillah) and worse than Iblees even brazenly claimed that they hid their Kufr (Nauthubillah)! All such blasphemous and disrespectful statements are from amongst the beliefs of the Kuffaar Shias. The Azhari chaps have themselves advertised that they engaged with the Shia and they even shamelessly gave him the honourable title of ‘brother’. The man reviles the Sahaabah and these Munaafiq unity-seekers call him ‘brother’. Does this Azhari chap even have Imaan?

Before commenting further, let us see what Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said about those who revile the Sahaabah (Radhiyalllahu Anhum Ajma’een):

1 – Hadhrat Abdullah Ibn Abbaas Radhiyallahu Anhu narrates that Rasoolullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said: “He who reviles my As-haab, then upon him (the one who condemns the Sahaabah) is the Curse of Allah, the Angels and the entire mankind.” [Tabaraani – Jaami’ul Ahaadeeth – Kanzul Ummaal – similar wording in Majma’uz Zawaaid]

2 – Hadhrat Anas Bin Maalik Radhiyallahu Anhu said: “Some people from amongst the companions of Rasoolullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam asked: ‘O Prophet of Allah! Will we be reviled/abused/insulted?’ So Rasoolullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam stated: ‘He who reviles my As-haab, then upon him (the one who insults) is the Curse of Allah, the Angels and the entire mankind. Neither his Fardh nor his Nafl will be accepted.’” [Fadhaa-ilus Sahaabah of Imaam Ahmed – Tabaraani – Amaali Al-Mahaamili – Al-Mahrawaaniyaat – As-Sunnah lil Khallaal]

3 – Hadhrat Jaabir Radhiyallahu Anhu narrates: “Rasoolullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam looked one day whilst the people crowded around him or something like that, so he said: ‘Verily, the people are increasing whereas my companions are decreasing. So do not revile my companions. May Allah curse those who revile them (i.e. the Sahaabah)!’ [Tabaraani – Hilyatul Awliyaa – Taareekh Ibn Asaakir – Kanzul Ummaal – last portion of this Hadeeth also in Majma’uz Zawaaid and Musnad Abu Ya’laa]

4 – Hadhrat Ibn Umar Radhiyallahu Anhu narrates that Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said: “Whoever reviles my companions, then upon him is the Curse of Allah.” [Musnad Bazaar – Majma’uz Zawaaid]

5 – Hadhrat Abu Sa’eed Khudri Radhiyallahu Anhu narrates that Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said: “Do not revile my As-haab (companions) for if anyone of you spend gold equal to Mount Uhud (in the path of Allah Ta’ala), it will not be equal to a Mudd or even half a Mudd spent by one of them.” [Mishkaat – Bukhari – Muslim – Nasaai – Tirmizi – Abu Dawood – Ibn Maajah]

‘Mudd’ is a very small measurement.  Rasulullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam used one mudd of water for wudhu. One mudd amounts to approximately 1 litre. Besides the Ambiyaa, no one and no person can match the Sahaabah!

6 – Hadhrat Ibn Umar Radhiyallahu Anhu narrates that Rasoolullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said: “All people (i.e. those professing to be Muslims) will hope for salvation on the Day of Qiyaamah, except those who blasphemed my companions. For verily, the people assembled (gathered on the Day of Qiyaamah) will curse them.” [Suyooti in Jaami’ul Ahaadeeth – Haakim in his Taareekh – Sheeraazi in Alqaab – Kanzul Ummaal – Akhbaar Asbahaani]

7 – Hadhrat Uwaim Bin Saa’idah Radhiyallahu Anhu narrates that Rasoolullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said: “Verily Allah chose me and He chose for me As-haab (companions). Therefore, He made for me from amongst them ministers, assistants, and families (in-laws). So whoever reviles my As-haab, then upon him (the one who insults) is the Curse of Allah, the Angels and the entire mankind. Neither his Fardh nor his Nafl will be accepted.’” [Mustadrak Haakim – Tabaraani – An-Nahyu an Sabbil As-haab lil-Maqdisi – Jaami’ul Ahaadeeth – Kanzul Ummaal – Majma’uz Zawaaid – Mirqaat – Al-Hujjah]

8 – Hadhrat Ayesha Radhiyallahu Anha narrates that Rasoolullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said: “Do not revile my companions. May the Curse of Allah be on those who revile my As-haab (i.e. the Sahaabah)!” [Tabaraani – Majma’uz Zawaaid]

9 – Hadhrat Ibn Umar Radhiyallahu Anhu narrates that Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said: “May the Curse of Allah be on those who condemn my As-haab (i.e. the companions)!” [Tabaraani – Jam’ul Jawaami’ – Kanzul Ummaal – Majma’uz Zawaaid – Sharah Usool I’tiqaad Ahlis Sunnah]

10 – Hadhrat Ataa Bin Abi Rabaah Rahmatullah Alayh narrates that Rasoolullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said: “Whoever reviles my companions, then upon him is the Curse of Allah.” [Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah – Fadhaa-ilus Sahaabah of Imaam Ahmed Bin Hambal – Kitaabus Sunnah Ibni Abi Aasim– Musnad Ibnul Ja’d]

After mentioning the above, take note of the following:

1. The statements made by Khalid Sayed are statements of Kufr, which expel a person from the fold of Islam. Khalid Sayed was already a Kaafir even before he uttered his blasphemous statements. This is because Khalid is a Shia and attends the Shia Temple! Only Shia Kuffaar frequent the Shia Temples – not Muslims!

2. The Kufr utterances are not only offensive, but the offender also renders himself a Kaafir with such sacrilegious statements or in this case merely confirms his Kufr status since he was a Shia for many years already. He merely let the cat out of the bag and gave us a good idea of what Kufr filth is being propagated at the Shia Temple! But, some so-called Mozlems seeking ‘unity’ with the Shias are sleeping!

3. It should be remembered that Jack did not make the statements of profanity. The statements of Kufr were made by a person who thinks, believes and claims to be a Muslim. He even has a Muslim name. Therefore, such a person has to be informed that such blasphemous remarks, which even swines do not utter, expel a person from Islam. A person who criticizes the Sahaabah is worse than the Khanaazeer. He is mal’oon (accursed) in the Sight of Allah Ta’ala as proven from the above Ahaadeeth.

4. Shias are not Muslims. There is no such a thing as Shia Islam. But the behavior of the morons of the Cape Town Ulama Board as well as the publicized apology from CTUB clearly proves that they consider Shias to be Muslims. If not, then why talk to a Shia about ‘Ahlus Sunnah’. No one speaks about ‘Ahlus Sunnah’ to Jack! What will Jack understand about ‘Ahlus Sunnah’? A person will simply speak about Islam to Jack and not ‘Ahlus Sunnah’. Tell the Shia straight about the stance of Islam regarding the Sahaabah. Why speak about the stance of the ‘Ahlus Sunnah’? Khalid is a Shia – not a Salafi! Shias are non-Muslims, so engage with them accordingly.

5. Why use the words ‘Ahlus Sunnah’ when engaging with Khalid about the beliefs of Islam? Are there two Islams? An Ahlus Sunnah Islam and a ‘Shia Islam’? No, but this is what is understood from the CTUB Munaafiqs! The Cape Town Ulama Board are conducting themselves like Munaafiqs by speaking of Ahlus Sunnah and not Islam. They are Munaafiqs because the ‘retraction and apology for offensive statements’ which they published with their logo creates the false idea that there is something called Shia Islam and that the Khalid chap is a Muslim, albeit a Shia! Nowhere does renewal of Imaan or the issue of Kufr feature in their retraction-article!

6. They also speak of Sunni community. Rather speak of Muslim community and give the message to the Shia that he is not a Muslim because Shiism and Islam are two opposites! Speak of the beliefs of Islam and the stance of Islam – not of Sunni and other misleading terms which imply that Shias are Muslims. The ‘Sunni’ term clearly gives away the game that they regard Shias to be Muslims. No wonder we see this CTIEC and other deviates commemorating Karbala in emulation of the Shias. These chaps know very little or are deliberately ignoring what Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam told Hadhrat Ali Radhiyallahu Anhu about the Rawaafidh. They are really sleeping. It is obvious that Fisq, Bid’ah and Shia-bootlicking has sealed their brains. Their research on Shiism is weak and their conduct is despicable.

7. It is obvious that the Khalid chap believes that he is a Muslim, despite tendering an apology. He (Khalid) believes that Shias are Muslims and that there is nothing wrong in being a Shia. Here too, the uucsa Azhari had miserably failed in discharging Amr Bil Ma’roof Nahi Anil Munkar. They should explain the evil and Kufr of Shiism. But, the Faasiq is showing the Shia our Aqaaid Kitaabs of the Khilaafat being thirty years. Show the Shia all the hundreds of Fatwas of Kufr against the Shias in the Kutub of Islam! Invite him to Islam or at least explain the Kufr of Shiism. It is necessary to inform the Murtads pretending to be Muslims who make such evil and disgusting statements, that in Islam such statements are Kufr.

8. The questions which Azhari and all uucsa chaps must answer are: Is this Khalid Sayed a Muslim? Does such vile comments regarding the Sahaabah render a person Kaafir? If a Mufti cannot answer these questions, then he should rather close down his institution! Is making Takfeer of the Sahaabah not an act of Kufr?

9. The Nifaaq of this Azhari chap gets even worse. When Ulama rightfully indulge in Takfeer, then this Azhari chap makes a big noise. But, when the Sahaabah are targets for Takfeer, then he automatically forgets the very same Hadeeth which he and others of his ilk throw at the Ulama-e-Haq which teaches us that if the Fatwa of Kufr is wrong, it rebounds on the one who issued the reckless Fatwa of Kufr. Now, why did Azhari not point out this fact to the Shia who believes that Shias are Muslims when the Sahaabah were targeted and declared as Munaafiqeen? Why such double standards from uucsa characters?

10. The apology speaks of ‘repenting’ and ‘retracting’! Repentance for a Shia Kaafir is accepting Islam and adopting proper Islamic beliefs! Repentance without renewal of Imaan is worthless when Kufr is perpetrated. Furthermore, public Taubah from Shiism and public renewal of Imaan is necessary due to it being Kufr in public that was disgorged. This ‘retraction’ and ‘repentance’ which the Cape uucsa characters have publicized, is indeed laughable. Are these Azhari characters so incompetent in issues pertaining to Imaan and Kufr???

11. What about the issue of Taqiyah when dealing with a Shia! Can a person be so naïve to publish an apology from a person who believes in Taqiyah? This is downright stupidity from the uucsa members! Who are they trying to fool? It is indisputable that the Taqiyah ‘apology’ which the uucsa chaps publicized, is misleading. Hubbe-jah (love for name and fame) is the motivating factor.

12. Even if we have to momentarily close our eyes to reality and stupidly assume that the chap was not a Shia, but a Muslim, then too, the grounds for declaring him Kaafir are plenty. For example, declaring any of the members of Asharah Mubasharah as Munaafiq renders a person a Murtad. It is open denial of the words of Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam! In fact, this chap has rejected the Qur’aan by declaring the three greatest Sahaabah as Munaafiqeen. Nauthubillah. Hence, the need was to inform him of his Kufr and make Takfeer. Nevertheless, the Azhari chap misses the point. They seeking publicity with their stupid engagement with a Shia who openly proves that he is a Kaafir with his extremely vile revilement of the Sahaabah. This Cape Molvi is undoubtedly lost and deviated.

He speaks about the Muslim community being hurt which is true, but deliberately pays no attention to the fact that calling the Sahaabah as Munaafiqeen is clear-cut Kufr which expels a person from the fold of Islam. This is the most important point which the Azhari chap has not conveyed to the masses. The Shaytaani behaviour of the Azhari chap portrays the idea that Shias are Muslims. Is this Molvi so uneducated with regards to Shiism! This is an issue of Imaan and Kufr and not just an apology.

13. No benefit of the doubt can be given to this Azhari Munaafiq, because he terms the Shia as “Brother Muhammad Khalid Sayed”. The Kaafir insults and condemns the Sahaabah and the Cape Town Munaafiq Board gives the respectable title of “BROTHER” to the Shia! Have you no shame, Haroon Azhari? If a man who condemns Hadhrat Abu Bakr Radhiyallahu Anhu as a Munaafiq is your brother, then what are you? The true colours of the CTIEC-CTUB cannot be concealed…

When it was Covid, then this Munaafiq Azhari was in the frontline to close the Masaajid and misinterpret Ahaadeeth, etc. which pleased the Munaafiq doctors and the Kuffaar government. Now what about all the Ahaadeeth quoted above which clearly prove that the Murtad is accursed.

14. Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam did not say engage with the one who curses the Sahaabah. Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam instructed us to curse them! Instead of cursing, the uucsa chap ignores the command of Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam, engages with the chap, and publicizes his Taqiyah apology in a silly attempt to mislead the masses as if the chap is still a Muslim!

The talk of conflict resolution being a Sunnah in relation to Shias, who condemn the Sahaabah, is misleading. Those who revile the Sahaabah are accursed. Nabi Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam said we should curse them. The attempt to resolve conflicts with the Shias is plain trash if it means that we should accept Shias to be Muslims. If according to deviates, quoting the Ahaadeeth which expose Shiism means that we are provoking conflict, then the deviates can go to Hell!

Deviates are also talking of working together to serve humanity. Alhamdulillah, Muslims have nothing to do with those who condemn the Sahaabah and Shias are not considered to be part of Islam. It is not permissible to show honour and respect to those who speak ill of the Sahaabah Radhiyallahu Anhum. Will this Azhari chap show honour to a person who calls his mother a prostitute? Never!

15. Their abstention from Takfeer of the Shias is mind-boggling. We wonder what stupid excuses all these morons will tender for their abstention from Takfeer of the Shia blasphemer at this juncture. Making Takfeer of the Sahaabah is no trivial issue. It is a huge crime in the Shariah. This whole saga has just proven the amount of hatred Shias have for the Sahaabah and also reveals how much Taqiyah they indulge in. But the attitude shown by the CTUB uucsa clique is indeed lamentable. The Kufr of the Shias is so obvious to the extent that some Fuqaha have even written that the one who adopts tawaqquf (hesitancy or non-acquittal) concerning the kufr of the Shias, is a Kaafir just like the Shias. However, some Molvis like politics!

Whilst the Shia ‘apologized’, Allah Ta’ala alone knows what is in his heart. But, the fact that he has not abandoned Shiism means that he is still a Kaafir. The fact that he has not publicly renewed his Imaan also proves that he is not a Muslim in terms of the Shariah. Nowhere in the stupid apology published by the Cape Town morons is it written that he has adopted the beliefs of Islam with regards to the Sahaabah. So what then is the apology worth if he still believes in his heart what he said, despite the fact that he will try his best not to say publicly such things about the Sahaabah in such a manner and in such circles that it will not reach the ears of Muslims? He has not changed his Kufr beliefs and will ensure he stays for a considerable period within the limits and not cross the boundaries of Taqiyah. Therefore, there is no proof that he has really abandoned the Shia beliefs of Kufr because the apology publicized by the Bid’atis is lacking these vital facts of Imaan.

Whilst these Cape characters are seeking honour and publicity through deception and Baatil, they must not forget that Allah Ta’ala will disgrace them with the Haq. Allah Ta’ala will disgrace all those who call Shias their brothers. Moreover, this means that these backstabbers are not our brothers. The Imaan of the CTUB-uucsa clique is questionable! If they cannot condemn Shiism as Kufr, they are not Muslims!!!